In a good article explaining why there's so much Chinese investment flowing into housing, I found this funny:
Therefore, housing is special because it is much more concrete than other investments.
I like Yichuan Wang's writing style!
Therefore, housing is special because it is much more concrete than other investments.
Etched into the base of Google's new wireless home media player that was introduced on Wednesday is its most intriguing feature. On the underside of the Nexus Q is a simple inscription: “Designed and Manufactured in the U.S.A.”Stay tuned.

According to the trade figures released over the weekend, crude oil shipments hit a record-high of 5.95m barrels per day. China's imports of copper and iron ore also rose during the month.One last point: if China really does become a voracious importer, expect the complaints to be almost as loud as the complaints against China's exporting. It's irrational, but you can expect to hear things like "China is driving up prices for everything." Just the exact mirror complaint of "China is selling everything too cheaply for us to compete," but the complainers will never see their own irony.

For those craving even faster speeds, CSR Corp, China’s biggest trainmaker, has unveiled a supertrain (pictured above) said to be inspired by the shape of an ancient Chinese sword. It should slice through the air at 500kph.C'mon, baby!
The importance of exports as a driver of China's growth is overstated. Exports as a percentage of China's 2010 gross domestic product were 27%, down from 35% in 2007. In value-added terms, the real share of exports is even smaller. UBS economist Wang Tao sees a base case in which falling exports shave a percentage point from China's 2012 GDP growth. With GDP growth expected to be around 9% in 2011, all else being equal, that is hardly a disaster.Real-estate investment is a key driver of China's growth, equal to around 14% of GDP in 2010. Ghost towns of empty houses raise fears that construction might be set to slow sharply. But with millions moving from the countryside to the city each year, and rising wages driving demand for higher-quality accommodations for existing city dwellers, fundamental demand is strong. The government also has policy options: Borrowing restrictions for developers can be loosened and speculators allowed back into the market.
Spot on.
There are way too many empty apartments in the cities now. But there are still hundreds of millions of people who are going to want to fill them in the coming years. If prices fall, it will simply speed up migration to the cities.

Why Africa doesn't make more stuff has been an enduring mystery of the global economy. As wages rose in manufacturing powerhouses such as China, many economists predicted that factories would flock to cheaper pools of labor in Africa, helping to spur the same sort of rapid industrial growth that lifted living standards across Asia.
Africa's industry isn't so different from the modest roots of China's own industrial revolution. In the 1980s, Chinese farmers invested in factories to make goods for rural consumers. Multinationals arrived later to fuel an export boom, according to Zhang Chunlin, an economist at the World Bank in Pretoria who specializes on private-sector development.
China's challenge was "to develop in an imperfect environment," says Mr. Zhang, who once worked at a village brick kiln in the northern China. "That is also Africa's challenge."



In one study conducted in two regions of China, researchers offered randomly selected poor households a large subsidy on the price of the basic staple (wheat noodles in one region, rice in the other). We usually expect that when the price of something goes down, people buy more of it. The opposite happened. Households that received subsidies for rice or wheat consumed less of those two foods and ate more shrimp and meat, even though their staples now cost less. Overall, the caloric intake of those who received the subsidy did not increase (and may even have decreased), despite the fact that their purchasing power had increased. Nor did the nutritional content improve in any other sense. The likely reason is that because the rice and wheat noodles were cheap but not particularly tasty, feeling richer might actually have made them consume less of those staples. This reasoning suggests that at least among these very poor urban households, getting more calories was not a priority: Getting better-tasting ones was.